When we think about a past event we take something that we have previously sensed and recall it. We basically replay a movie from the material we have stored in a past time, and the images we project in this movie can be more or less representative of the reality as it happened. On the other hand, when we experience the present we don't really recall much, we sense the events as they are happening to us and try to react to them. If our brain can not interpret something in real time, then somehow it fills in the gap by fabricating a fictitious sensation based in our past experiences, but in any case the present is a time of feeling, of sensing the moment.
Now, if in the scale of time the future is closer to the present than to the past, then why when we think about the future we first build the images and sounds like if it were a memory, and from those memories then generate feelings? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Shouldn't it be more coherent to try to just "feel" the future and then, as a second process build the images and sounds that can help us interpret those feelings?